jeffmiller:

(via ESPN Chink In The Armor Team USA Basketball Headline | Olympics)
The editor fired from ESPN apologized profusely for the Lin headline, and claimed it was an innocent mistake:
He said he has used the phrase “at least 100 times” in headlines over the years and thought nothing of it when he slapped it on the Lin story.  Federico called Lin one of his heroes - not just because he’s a big Knicks fan, but because he feels a kinship with a fellow “outspoken Christian.”  “My faith is my life,” he said. “I’d love to tell Jeremy what happened and explain that this was an honest mistake.”
I’m inclined to believe him.  The above picture is from 2008.  And this article from 2011 is titled “Stock Watch:  Wall’s first chink in the armor.”  If you search Google news for “chink in the armor” usage prior to the end of 2001, you’ll find 977 results.  Respected news sources use this phrase in headlines; it’s part of the journalistic vernacular.   Here’s a New York Times op-ed with that title from 2003.
I’d like to live in a world where we give people the benefit of the doubt, excuse honest and innocent mistakes, and don’t fire people from their jobs because of angry mobs.  Should the editor have know better?  Sure.  But can’t we cut a guy working in the middle of the night a little slack?  
Sometimes an apology is enough.  This seems like it was one of those times.

I think it’s, to borrow from Bill Shakespeare, much ado about nothing.

jeffmiller:

(via ESPN Chink In The Armor Team USA Basketball Headline | Olympics)

The editor fired from ESPN apologized profusely for the Lin headline, and claimed it was an innocent mistake:

He said he has used the phrase “at least 100 times” in headlines over the years and thought nothing of it when he slapped it on the Lin story. Federico called Lin one of his heroes - not just because he’s a big Knicks fan, but because he feels a kinship with a fellow “outspoken Christian.” “My faith is my life,” he said. “I’d love to tell Jeremy what happened and explain that this was an honest mistake.”

I’m inclined to believe him.  The above picture is from 2008.  And this article from 2011 is titled “Stock Watch:  Wall’s first chink in the armor.”  If you search Google news for “chink in the armor” usage prior to the end of 2001, you’ll find 977 results.  Respected news sources use this phrase in headlines; it’s part of the journalistic vernacular.   Here’s a New York Times op-ed with that title from 2003.

I’d like to live in a world where we give people the benefit of the doubt, excuse honest and innocent mistakes, and don’t fire people from their jobs because of angry mobs.  Should the editor have know better?  Sure.  But can’t we cut a guy working in the middle of the night a little slack?  

Sometimes an apology is enough.  This seems like it was one of those times.

I think it’s, to borrow from Bill Shakespeare, much ado about nothing.

posted 3 months ago

gigliotta:

I miss this…

I do, too.

gigliotta:

I miss this…

I do, too.

posted 11 months ago

shortformblog:

BREAKING: Republican Congressmen Pass Republican Thing That Has No Hope of Becoming Actual Law

Know how Obama ripped the GOP in private for not really focusing on realistic things? All our president has to do to make the House GOP look like total idiots is point out —

posted 1 year ago

gigliotta:

Proud to be an Aggie! 2011 NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS……….
………ok, back to studying.

gigliotta:

Proud to be an Aggie! 2011 NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS……….

………ok, back to studying.

posted 1 year ago

The president’s walking away from the deficit commission he set up was, to my mind, one of those moments when his caution was not about the substance of the issue but the politics. He knows we need to cut entitlements and defense or face fiscal collapse. And yet he has allowed Paul Ryan to move into the vacuum Obama created on the most important domestic issue of the day. Ryan’s proposal, whatever you think of it, is serious. His proposal for Medicare looks to me like an extension of the Romney/Obama healthcare exchanges. His proposal for Medicaid - block grants to the states - will inevitably cut down on sky-rocketing healthcare spending. His tax reform is straight out of Bowles-Simpson… . And the Democrats and Obama now have to offer a response. The question I’ll be asking is quite simply: how would they save $5.8 trillion from the federal budget over the next decade? Tell us, please.

Where Obama Feared To Tread - The Dish | By Andrew Sullivan - The Daily Beast

If Democrats wish to have integrity on this matter, they’ll need to push for massive tax increases—not just increases on the very rich (there aren’t enough of them to fix this hole) but on nearly everyone.  The Democrats are not going to do this; Obama has steadfastly refused.  So what will the Democrats offer instead?  I suspect that they’ll keep offering the fictitious notion that we can keep spending more and everything will be alright.  Will that work with the voters?  Americans don’t believe in this fantasyland, not for a second; but they also hate the reality of the need for actual sacrifice enough that they may vote for it anyway.  Even when the electorate votes for politicians who promise to provide less, their anger usually swells once the promise of actual cuts inches toward reality.  That’s what the Republican governors are learning now—sometimes Americans vote for the candidate with a grasp on reality because they like to feel like they also grasp reality; that doesn’t mean they actually want to confront reality—they just want to feel like they have.

(via jeffmiller)

posted 1 year ago

Patients are demanding doctors’ orders for over-the-counter products because of a provision in the health-care overhaul that slipped past nearly everyone’s radar. It says people who want a tax break to buy such items with what’s known as flexible-spending accounts need to get a prescription first. The result is that Americans are visiting their doctors before making a trip to the drugstore, hoping their physician will help them out by writing the prescription. The new requirements create not only an added burden for doctors, but also new complications for retailers and pharmacies. “It drives up the cost of health care as opposed to reducing it,” says Dr. Chung, who rejected much of a 10-item request from a mother of four that included pain relievers and children’s cold medicine.

In Health Law, Rx for Trouble - WSJ.com (h/t Reason). Is it an unintended consequence if everyone with a brain saw it coming?

There have been numerous unintended consequences of the health care bill already; there will be far more to come.

I don’t believe that it is possible for our government to design a system that could manage all of our nation’s health care.  Certainly, the hastily drafted pastiche of compromise they enacted has no chance to work.  

(via jeffmiller)

(via jeffmiller)

posted 1 year ago

posted 1 year ago

givemesomethingtoread:

Following the former Alaska governor’s road show, the author delves into the surreal new world Palin now inhabits—a place of fear, anger, and illusion, which has swallowed up the engaging, small-town hockey mom and her family—and the sadness she has left in her wake.

See this:

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/09/02/confirmed-pretty-much-everyone-offended-by-vanity-fair-hit-piece-on-palin/

Many Liberals are offended by this hit piece.

posted 1 year ago

It scares me a lot about our justice system,” she said. “If something happened to one of our kids or somebody in my house, I hate to think that the first thought of somebody is to think that I must have done something bad. Everybody’s looking for a reason to blame someone else. Bad things happen. It doesn’t always have to be somebody else’s fault.

Ryan Widmer jurors: 7-4 for conviction | cincinnati.com | Cincinnati.Com

The case is sad.  A woman died in her bathroom while her husband was downstairs, watching television.  There’s no evidence that he killed her, but they prosecuted him anyway.  In the first trial, a jury unanimously found him guilty; the verdict was set aside for juror misconduct.  In the second trial, the jury couldn’t reach a verdict … but most jurors wanted to convict.  

There are some people who figure that the government wouldn’t bring a case if the defendant weren’t guilty.  These people scare me.  The government makes mistakes all the time.  

There are some people who figure that everything bad must be someone’s fault.  These people scare me too.  Sometimes bad things happen.  Sometimes things happen that we can’t explain.  

The other day, I was eating lunch in downtown D.C., and some people outside were protesting B.P.  Fine.  I have no problem with that.  But one of the protesters had a cardboard cut-out of the B.P. C.E.O. wearing pinstripes.  And that upset me.  It’s possible that there was criminal misconduct.  But not every bad thing has to be a crime.  Sometimes, people make honest mistakes.  Sometimes, people are wrong when they tried to be right.  Sometimes, bad things just happen.  

When something bad happens, our first thought should be to comfort those who are hurt, to fix the problem, and to clean up the damage.  Too often, though, people jump right to punish.

(via jeffmiller)

posted 1 year ago

Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs. But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards – all areas where Flash falls short.
Steve Jobs - Thoughts on Flash (via minimalmac)

posted 2 years ago